26.3 C
Bengaluru
Saturday, December 4, 2021
Home INDIA 10 Key Arguments by Aryan Khan's Lawyer In Courtroom

10 Key Arguments by Aryan Khan’s Lawyer In Courtroom


Mumbai:

Aryan Khan’s bail plea – his third since his arrest on October 3 – was heard by the Bombay Excessive Courtroom Tuesday afternoon, with former Legal professional Common Mukul Rohatgi a part of a high-powered authorized workforce.

Earlier right this moment the Narcotics Management Bureau (NCB) accused Pooja Dadlani, who’s the supervisor of Aryan’s father, Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan, of trying to influence witnesses. Aryan Khan has stated he had nothing to do with the Rs 8 crore payoff allegations involving Sameer Wankhede.

Listed below are the highest 10 arguments by Aryan Khan’s lawyer right this moment:

  1. “As far as I (Aryan Khan) am concerned, there is NO recovery, NO consumption and NO medical test. Arbaaz Merchant had six grams of charas which was recovered from his shoes. Merchant is denying it… I am not concerned, except that he is my friend.”
  2. “My case is NOT conscious possession. What somebody had in their shoe or wherever is not my concern… What was recovered (from Arbaaz Merchant) was small – six grams. This is not enough to keep me in custody. Many others have been found with intermediary and commercial quantity.”
  3. “It (the drugs) was not in my control… what was found in Arbaaz Merchant’s shoe. Arbaaz is not my servant, he is not in my control, so there is no conspiracy. Max you may link me with Arbaaz and accused no. 17 (Aachit Kumar) only after recovery. But I am not linked with anyone else. Conspiracy is when all have met and have a meeting of minds.”
  4. “There was a statement under Section 67 which was retracted (the NCB has pointed to this statement to show “he (Aryan) used to eat medication” and has said it is “admissible till confirmed unsuitable”). We had raised this in the Supreme Court… (NCB officials) are officers and not police… statements made to NDPS officers are inadmissible.”
  5. “As for the WhatsApp chats, they were of the time period of 2018. None of the chats are from the cruise. There is no case where those chats with ‘123’ have anything to do with this saga… to use general phrase like ‘conspiracy’ is not right. The chats do not pertain to the cruise or conspiracy. This is in the past and is just supposed to show conspiracy.”
  6. “These are young boys. They can be sent to rehab and need not undergo trial. It had come in some newspaper that Social Ministry mentioned reform… Maximum punishment is imprisonment of one year… that is maximum and not minimum. I am not, in any case, concerned with Section 27A. There is no evidence. I have not financed trafficking.”
  7. Accused No. 17 (Aachit Kumar) is a younger faculty child. From the data which might be popping out, A17 is a buddy with whom Aryan Khan was enjoying on-line poker… and that was the communication exchanged. Primarily based on that communication they’re exhibiting connection.”
  8. “Past this communication there may be nothing. Aryan Khan was requested in regards to the chats and he stated he knew because of the on-line recreation. These days there may be lots of on-line gaming. We’ve got on-line poker, on-line cricket…”
  9. “Sameer Wankhede… he stated it’s on account of enmity with a political character whose son-in-law was arrested (a reference to Maharashtra minister Nawab Malik). Immediately what’s being stated is rebounding on me. Kindly hold me away from that controversy. I’m making it clear I’ve nothing in opposition to any NCB officer. I’ve no grievance.”
  10. “Now this paragraph has point out of (my father’s) supervisor (Pooja Dadlani) and I filed a rejoinder saying I’m not making allegations in opposition to officers or panchnamas and I’ve no connection. I’m respectfully submitting I’m not making any allegation. It is a regular case apart from this unsavoury feedback.”



Source link

Most Popular